Ron, that’s a really good point. I was thinking 6-string, not 12-string. I have softened my language around the guitar bits some, but stand by my conclusion. Given the full-width poured inlays, the bass neck could ONLY have come from April/May 1973.
I think the white 1975 example is best-executed. But the necks should definitely be the other way. Regardless of anyone’s ‘usual’ playing style, it’s easier to fret and strum a guitar if it’s a little higher than one’s used to; and anyone can fret and finger-pluck a bass that’s a little lower than one’s used to.
Also the controls don’t have to be duplicated (that’s just too eery); although they could have used that famous Rickenbacker 5th knob as the guitar/bass selector switch.
And, of course, Rick-O-Sound stereo wiring is a must!
Inspiration behind my “4050/12” restomodded by Chris as well!
There are a few 360/12 models from 1973 that still have the '60s appointments: 21 fret neck, crushed pearl inlays, toaster pickups. Here's one: https://www.ronsvintage.com/guitars/rickenbacker-1973-model-360-12
Ron, that’s a really good point. I was thinking 6-string, not 12-string. I have softened my language around the guitar bits some, but stand by my conclusion. Given the full-width poured inlays, the bass neck could ONLY have come from April/May 1973.
I agree, they simply got the years mixed up.
I think the white 1975 example is best-executed. But the necks should definitely be the other way. Regardless of anyone’s ‘usual’ playing style, it’s easier to fret and strum a guitar if it’s a little higher than one’s used to; and anyone can fret and finger-pluck a bass that’s a little lower than one’s used to.
Also the controls don’t have to be duplicated (that’s just too eery); although they could have used that famous Rickenbacker 5th knob as the guitar/bass selector switch.
And, of course, Rick-O-Sound stereo wiring is a must!
I wholeheartedly disagree! Guitar on top is the way to go! More comfortable dealing with both necks that way.