6 Comments
User's avatar
Woody Cross's avatar

Really love the overall color of it, minus the darker center. RIC could issue a new version as “Honeyglo”.

Premiervox's avatar

Hi Andy, check this out: "That’s the defining feature of a true “signature model”: the artist is compensated for the use of their name as part of a formalized endorsement."

If so, are any of the John Hall-era "artist signature models" actually signature models under this definition? Did the artists named on those models - you know who they are - receive compensation from RIC for the use of their name? If so, it likely wasn't based on sales volume. (See Glen Frey models)

Stu Cook's avatar

Yes, if a free guitar is considered as compensation.

Andy White's avatar

Ron, they absolutely were, although I can’t tell you how much. Petty was famously kinda ticked that he didn’t continue to receive a royalty for the non-signature version of the 660 since it WAS a guitar he had developed…

Premiervox's avatar

What about the 'Lennon Reissues" 2000 guitars in the early '90s in several models. Those are definitely "artist signature models." Did Yoko get paid for those?

Andy White's avatar

Absolutely. I’d wager one of the reasons the SLE’s were of a fixed quantity was to guarantee the artist a specific payout—and to amortize that payout to an acceptable per-guitar level for Rickenbacker. Not sure if Rick or Glenn Frey took a bath on the GF, but I suspect it was Rick…